Higher than expected government borrowing has reduced the Chancellor’s ‘wiggle room’ at a pre-election Budget.

Government borrowing – the difference between spending and tax income – was £120.7 billion in the year to March, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

This was £7.6 billion lower than last year, but £60 billion higher than the year before the pandemic and, critically, £6.6 billion higher than the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) forecast at the Spring Budget.

High inflation and rising interest rates also contributed to public spending rising by £58 billion for the year, according to the ONS.

Cara Pacitti, Senior Economist at the Resolution Foundation, said:

‘Last year was one of high but falling inflation and rising interest rates, causing both spending and tax receipts to rise in nominal terms compared to the year before.

‘While lower than last year, borrowing is already £6.6 billion higher than forecast at the Spring Budget last month. So far there are no signs of any new fiscal wriggle room emerging that might allow the Chancellor to announce another pre-election Budget in the Autumn.’

Internet links: ONS website Resolution Foundation website

New guidance from HMRC on Research and Development (R&D) tax relief ‘could be clearer’, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

HMRC’s draft guidance covers the restriction applying for contractor payments and payments for externally provided workers (EPWs) where the R&D activity takes place overseas; and the new rules for contracted-out R&D.

The ICAEW’s Tax Faculty believes that additional clarity would be helpful on a few of the new points.

It also said that the guidance ‘does not fully address the implications of an arrangement between the customer and the contractor that is governed by multiple contracts’. The Institute has called for the guidance to explain how to determine if the contractor took R&D into consideration at the time of the contract when multiple contract dates exist.

The ICAEW also called for clarity on the requirement that the carrying-on of R&D needs to be the primary objective of the customer in engaging the contractor if the customer is to claim the associated R&D tax relief.

Internet link: ICAEW website

New guidance from HMRC on Research and Development (R&D) tax relief ‘could be clearer’, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

HMRC’s draft guidance covers the restriction applying for contractor payments and payments for externally provided workers (EPWs) where the R&D activity takes place overseas; and the new rules for contracted-out R&D.

The ICAEW’s Tax Faculty believes that additional clarity would be helpful on a few of the new points.

It also said that the guidance ‘does not fully address the implications of an arrangement between the customer and the contractor that is governed by multiple contracts’. The Institute has called for the guidance to explain how to determine if the contractor took R&D into consideration at the time of the contract when multiple contract dates exist.

The ICAEW also called for clarity on the requirement that the carrying-on of R&D needs to be the primary objective of the customer in engaging the contractor if the customer is to claim the associated R&D tax relief.

Internet link: ICAEW website

New guidance from HMRC on Research and Development (R&D) tax relief ‘could be clearer’, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

HMRC’s draft guidance covers the restriction applying for contractor payments and payments for externally provided workers (EPWs) where the R&D activity takes place overseas; and the new rules for contracted-out R&D.

The ICAEW’s Tax Faculty believes that additional clarity would be helpful on a few of the new points.

It also said that the guidance ‘does not fully address the implications of an arrangement between the customer and the contractor that is governed by multiple contracts’. The Institute has called for the guidance to explain how to determine if the contractor took R&D into consideration at the time of the contract when multiple contract dates exist.

The ICAEW also called for clarity on the requirement that the carrying-on of R&D needs to be the primary objective of the customer in engaging the contractor if the customer is to claim the associated R&D tax relief.

Internet link: ICAEW website

New guidance from HMRC on Research and Development (R&D) tax relief ‘could be clearer’, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

HMRC’s draft guidance covers the restriction applying for contractor payments and payments for externally provided workers (EPWs) where the R&D activity takes place overseas; and the new rules for contracted-out R&D.

The ICAEW’s Tax Faculty believes that additional clarity would be helpful on a few of the new points.

It also said that the guidance ‘does not fully address the implications of an arrangement between the customer and the contractor that is governed by multiple contracts’. The Institute has called for the guidance to explain how to determine if the contractor took R&D into consideration at the time of the contract when multiple contract dates exist.

The ICAEW also called for clarity on the requirement that the carrying-on of R&D needs to be the primary objective of the customer in engaging the contractor if the customer is to claim the associated R&D tax relief.

Internet link: ICAEW website