New guidance from HMRC on Research and Development (R&D) tax relief ‘could be clearer’, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

HMRC’s draft guidance covers the restriction applying for contractor payments and payments for externally provided workers (EPWs) where the R&D activity takes place overseas; and the new rules for contracted-out R&D.

The ICAEW’s Tax Faculty believes that additional clarity would be helpful on a few of the new points.

It also said that the guidance ‘does not fully address the implications of an arrangement between the customer and the contractor that is governed by multiple contracts’. The Institute has called for the guidance to explain how to determine if the contractor took R&D into consideration at the time of the contract when multiple contract dates exist.

The ICAEW also called for clarity on the requirement that the carrying-on of R&D needs to be the primary objective of the customer in engaging the contractor if the customer is to claim the associated R&D tax relief.

Internet link: ICAEW website

The government is being urged to implement reforms to the Research and Development (R&D) tax relief system in order to avoid hurting small companies by the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce.

A report released by the Chamber found that recent changes by HMRC and a ‘wild west’ regulatory system in regard to who can act as R&D tax advisers are ‘undermining confidence and take-up‘.

The Chamber collected a number of case studies and original survey research, which showed that 46% of small companies are deterred from making future claims based on their latest experience.

Chair of the Chamber’s R&D Tax Reliefs Task and Finish Group, Steve Elsom, said:

‘Our original research into local businesses’ experiences shows that the lack of knowledgeable experts at the HMRC, plus the imposition of an overly strict compliance regime is causing many legitimate companies’ most recent claims to be delayed and/or refused, with others fearful that previously successful claims from previous years might now be challenged.

‘Every right-thinking person applauds the crackdown in fraudulent claims, but HMRC appears to be going to extremes in its definition of the term. Our research showed that companies which might have made a very minor administrative error in their application are counted as fraudulent.’

Internet link: Suffolk Chamber of Commerce website

The government is being urged to implement reforms to the Research and Development (R&D) tax relief system in order to avoid hurting small companies by the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce.

A report released by the Chamber found that recent changes by HMRC and a ‘wild west’ regulatory system in regard to who can act as R&D tax advisers are ‘undermining confidence and take-up‘.

The Chamber collected a number of case studies and original survey research, which showed that 46% of small companies are deterred from making future claims based on their latest experience.

Chair of the Chamber’s R&D Tax Reliefs Task and Finish Group, Steve Elsom, said:

‘Our original research into local businesses’ experiences shows that the lack of knowledgeable experts at the HMRC, plus the imposition of an overly strict compliance regime is causing many legitimate companies’ most recent claims to be delayed and/or refused, with others fearful that previously successful claims from previous years might now be challenged.

‘Every right-thinking person applauds the crackdown in fraudulent claims, but HMRC appears to be going to extremes in its definition of the term. Our research showed that companies which might have made a very minor administrative error in their application are counted as fraudulent.’

Internet link: Suffolk Chamber of Commerce website

The government is being urged to implement reforms to the Research and Development (R&D) tax relief system in order to avoid hurting small companies by the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce.

A report released by the Chamber found that recent changes by HMRC and a ‘wild west’ regulatory system in regard to who can act as R&D tax advisers are ‘undermining confidence and take-up‘.

The Chamber collected a number of case studies and original survey research, which showed that 46% of small companies are deterred from making future claims based on their latest experience.

Chair of the Chamber’s R&D Tax Reliefs Task and Finish Group, Steve Elsom, said:

‘Our original research into local businesses’ experiences shows that the lack of knowledgeable experts at the HMRC, plus the imposition of an overly strict compliance regime is causing many legitimate companies’ most recent claims to be delayed and/or refused, with others fearful that previously successful claims from previous years might now be challenged.

‘Every right-thinking person applauds the crackdown in fraudulent claims, but HMRC appears to be going to extremes in its definition of the term. Our research showed that companies which might have made a very minor administrative error in their application are counted as fraudulent.’

Internet link: Suffolk Chamber of Commerce website

The government is being urged to implement reforms to the Research and Development (R&D) tax relief system in order to avoid hurting small companies by the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce.

A report released by the Chamber found that recent changes by HMRC and a ‘wild west’ regulatory system in regard to who can act as R&D tax advisers are ‘undermining confidence and take-up‘.

The Chamber collected a number of case studies and original survey research, which showed that 46% of small companies are deterred from making future claims based on their latest experience.

Chair of the Chamber’s R&D Tax Reliefs Task and Finish Group, Steve Elsom, said:

‘Our original research into local businesses’ experiences shows that the lack of knowledgeable experts at the HMRC, plus the imposition of an overly strict compliance regime is causing many legitimate companies’ most recent claims to be delayed and/or refused, with others fearful that previously successful claims from previous years might now be challenged.

‘Every right-thinking person applauds the crackdown in fraudulent claims, but HMRC appears to be going to extremes in its definition of the term. Our research showed that companies which might have made a very minor administrative error in their application are counted as fraudulent.’

Internet link: Suffolk Chamber of Commerce website